minority-2hire

1 Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have up until February 6 to decide whether to voluntarily leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday - that's less than a week from now - most will be enabled to depart and be paid until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment legal representative who workers as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM's deferred resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really do not consider it a lot a deal. I think it's a demand to resign with a vague pledge that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative leave status for as much as 8 months - however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been using the term buyout to explain what this is due to the fact that there seems to be the offer of administrative leave for up to eight months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would definitely not explain it as a buyout. I think that's a really misleading term to utilize in this scenario. When you believe of a buyout, there's generally some sort of written arrangement or employment a concrete offer to supply an advantage in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for employment your guidance, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is exercise extreme caution. There are no warranties included in this e-mail. The only thing I can inform you for certain is that if you alter your mind, the firm's probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some category of worker who you think this might benefit? Maybe they're close to retirement. Is somebody like that may this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most mindful because leaving earlier than planned can have severe consequences, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told press reporters that this is a good deal for individuals who do not wish to go back to the workplace. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal employees that they need to return in - to work. And if they don't, employment then they have the alternative to resign, and this administration is really generously using to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You're shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just - in a way, it breaks my heart that federal staff members are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it's designed to get folks who work really difficult to resign. I think it's trying to pull the wool over a great deal of people's eyes because there are no guarantees. And these are individuals who enjoy their job. They like the mission of the firm. They work hard. And today, they're facing very difficult options, specifically if they're remote. I imply, it's really coercive.MARTIN: You say it's coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you're someone who resides in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. or else we're going to fire you, they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal challenges simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be truthful, is so unmatched that I believe a lot of us are still trying to determine what to do with it. I'm uncertain if the offer itself might be challengeable. I believe the larger concern is the execution of these terms. I'm not aware of any authority that exists today for OPM to buy firms to provide this number of people administrative leave. So I think it is extremely much potentially setting the phase for obstacles since I feel OPM has actually significantly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment legal representative with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our website regards to usage and authorizations pages at www.npr.org for more information.

NPR transcripts are produced on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text might not be in its final type and may be upgraded or modified in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The reliable record of NPR's shows is the audio record.